ultraslacker wrote:Mark.AU wrote:So, the real question is whether you, Holly, have the courage to break the current paradigm?
If someone who is true to the RM vision and values wants to take RM over, they can, but I would never hand it over to someone whose core values do not align with mine, and with the other key members of the group.
So that's a "no" then.
Ok, your site, your rules. I made a deliberately provocative post to see what would happen, to see if it would generate discussion. It took a couple of days but there was one response from someone who contributes NOTHING to the site (and her response contributed NOTHING to this discussion), there was a good comment from Jennifer (which I don't agree with, but it definitely bears discussion), and then there was you.
You attacked me, which I expected, and then you challenged me to contribute; good!. I responded with some pretty good suggestions (I think) and you responded with... well, nothing really. You might have asked for elaboration on some of my points, as if you actually cared about "Future of RM".
Oh well, as you correctly point out, I don't have any skin in the game.
By the way, tell me, how successful have you been at finding anyone else who'd be willing to put some of their skin in? How did this thread work out for you, how many did you find willing to put some skin in the game?