La wrote:bruyere might be able to contend. She's already gone sub-90 (I think?). I don't think she's tried for sub 20/40 yet.
Yes she has, she's scary fast
Edit: I'm not sure about the half...I know the full she's sub 3:30
La wrote:bruyere might be able to contend. She's already gone sub-90 (I think?). I don't think she's tried for sub 20/40 yet.
mcshame wrote:La wrote:bruyere might be able to contend. She's already gone sub-90 (I think?). I don't think she's tried for sub 20/40 yet.
Yes she has, she's scary fast
Edit: I'm not sure about the half...I know the full she's sub 3:30
Doonst wrote:mcshame wrote:La wrote:bruyere might be able to contend. She's already gone sub-90 (I think?). I don't think she's tried for sub 20/40 yet.
Yes she has, she's scary fast
Edit: I'm not sure about the half...I know the full she's sub 3:30
The PB thread shows that she ran a 1:37:39 this year. No women are listed under 90 minutes, 5 under 100 minutes.
Ironboy wrote:5km race tomorrow. My 10km time from Fall colours predicts 21 min flat. Let's see if I can break that with better pacing than my last 5km attempt.
Inching ever closer. Maybe I should pull out the new shoes!
alexk wrote:Note to myself as I read this in the months to come...A few weeks ago, after much running-soul searching, I made a big promise to myself not to place a time value on my races. This challenge is nothing more than a fun experiment. Where and how it ends should be fun too!!!
On another note, along with Bruyere, I can think of a few other ladies who could rise to this challenge: Quickchick, JoggerBarbie, and Kristen. I'm sure there are lots others I just don't know. What do you think girls?
mcshame wrote:Did you scare away the ladies? I hope not, we need you ladies to keep the testosterone in check. Seriously, it would be great to get more people working towards the numbers.
Jwolf wrote:mcshame wrote:Did you scare away the ladies? I hope not, we need you ladies to keep the testosterone in check. Seriously, it would be great to get more people working towards the numbers.
I'd love to join in but my fitness isn't there yet for those numbers. My targets will be more like 22/45/105.
Ironboy wrote:Jwolf wrote:mcshame wrote:Did you scare away the ladies? I hope not, we need you ladies to keep the testosterone in check. Seriously, it would be great to get more people working towards the numbers.
I'd love to join in but my fitness isn't there yet for those numbers. My targets will be more like 22/45/105.
That's close enough!
Ironboy wrote:I think anyone currently in the low 20s for a 5km, mid 40s for a 10km and high 1:30s for a half would benefit and be beneficial to the group.
At least we should all be able to relate, and push each other, and maybe even trash talk a little.
Jwolf wrote:Ironboy wrote:Jwolf wrote:I'd love to join in but my fitness isn't there yet for those numbers. My targets will be more like 22/45/105.
That's close enough!
But it's not the title of the thread.
I'll post my workouts here if I'm allowed, though.
mcshame wrote:Do you think the ladies could come up with 5k/10k/21k challenge, I'll add it to the title of the thread. All are welcome.
Jwolf wrote:Ironboy wrote:I think anyone currently in the low 20s for a 5km, mid 40s for a 10km and high 1:30s for a half would benefit and be beneficial to the group.
At least we should all be able to relate, and push each other, and maybe even trash talk a little.
Thanks-- I hope the others agree.
mcshame wrote: Of the 3 distances, which do you think is the hardest? I'm thinking the 10k sub 40 seems to me to be the most difficult...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest